77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Delay in recording confessional statement may not be treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal hasn't challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )

The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed while in the bank and because only the appellants were posted for the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive bit of legislation that defines various criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for all those found guilty.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts get more info that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment from the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any probable adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to get crafted.

In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 in the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm to the person causes death of these kinds of person, either by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is claimed to commit qatl-i-khata.”

department concerned shall deliver the complete set of ACRs from the concerned officer to DPC effectively in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)

In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected on the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a possible fine.

Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration by the Court under Article 184 (three), has long been setting a precedent which allows for much easier access into the public to method the superior courts and the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its possible to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity on the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of such changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a strong legal system.

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are entirely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--